首页> 外文OA文献 >Heuristic evaluations of the accessibility of learning management systems (LMSs) as authoring tools for teachers
【2h】

Heuristic evaluations of the accessibility of learning management systems (LMSs) as authoring tools for teachers

机译:对作为教师创作工具的学习管理系统(LMS)的可访问性的启发式评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the development of e-education and e-society it is important for information and communication systems andservices to be equally accessible to all users, including people with disabilities. Learning Management Systems (LMSs)are becoming a necessity in higher education and making them accessible to all users, both students and teachers, iscrucial. Existing studies on accessibility of LMSs mostly focus on students and their access to learning materials. Veryfew studies have focused on the accessibility of LMSs for teachers who are responsible for using LMSs to createaccessible contents for students. This paper presents the heuristic evaluations of two Learning Management Systems(Fronter and Sakai) focusing on their accessibility from teachers’ perspective. Based on universal design principles andguidelines we aim to identify accessibility issues and to propose possible improvements. The Authoring ToolAccessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 were adopted in the heuristic evaluations and qualitative data have beencollected. We have also compared the findings from the evaluations of Fronter and Sakai, as well as Moodle, an opensource LMS which was evaluated in our previous heuristic evaluation. The analysis of the data shows that the level ofconformance of the systems to the ATAG2.0 guidelines is very low and many issues needs to be solved for them to befully accessible for teachers with disabilities.
机译:随着电子教育和电子社会的发展,信息通信系统和服务对包括残疾人在内的所有用户均具有同等的访问权限非常重要。学习管理系统(LMS)成为高等教育中的必需品,并使其对所有用户(包括学生和教师)均不可或缺。现有的有关LMS可达性的研究主要集中在学生及其学习材料的获取上。很少有研究侧重于负责使用LMS为学生创建可访问内容的教师的LMS可访问性。本文介绍了两种学习管理系统(Fronter和Sakai)的启发式评估,重点是从教师的角度来看它们的可访问性。基于通用设计原则和指南,我们旨在确定可访问性问题并提出可能的改进方案。在启发式评估中采用了Authoring ToolAccessibility Guidelines(ATAG)2.0,并收集了定性数据。我们还比较了Fronter和Sakai以及开放源LMS Moodle的评估结果,该评估在我们先前的启发式评估中进行了评估。数据分析表明,该系统符合ATAG2.0指南的水平非常低,需要解决许多问题才能使残疾教师能够完全使用它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号